It’s just that phrase, one of a zillion hacky lines in this thing. She’s also “in the club,” “naughty by nature” “drinking out the bottle,” “waving em side to side,” and “dancin’ the night away. There are no production elements involved. There’s no melody really - it’s parlando or whatever dumbass thing a musicologist like me might say. So we’ve got a common phrase that the plaintiffs didn’t invent. Yella’s coming in on beat one Miley comes in on beat two. Again, the rhythm is only partly similar.And where are J’s gonna go besides “on your feet?” On your head? I suppose someone could write “J’s On My Floor,” or “J’s Still In Their Box?” But “on your feet” is kinda the only prepositional phrase that anyone follows “J’s” with. It’s been said for a couple of decades by then. The complainers don’t own the phrase “J’s On My Feet.” Referring to Air Jordan’s as “J’s” is not a new original idea in 2012 when they published this track.It’s quarter note, two eighth-notes, and quarter note, kinda like musical morse code, “dash dot dot dash.” Rhythmically although the line comes in on a different beat, the internal rhythm of the phrase is common to both.“J’s On My Feet” says “J’s On My Feet,” and so does “23.” The latest chapter of Miley Cyrus's rebranding campaign arrived Tuesday in the form of another video, for her single '23.' The video, produced by Mike WiLL Made-It, stars Cyrus alongside rappers.So, you guessed it, yeah, they both say “J’s On My Feet.” I’m on a plane for six hours so what the heck, here’s the plaintiff’s track, “J’s On My Feet.” And the only reason I’m even writing it up here is that I’m baffled as to how things got even this far. “Yella the Triple Threat’s” complaint that the successful big hit song “23” (in which Miley indeed seems to enjoy J’s on her feet) infringes upon her 2012 track “J’s On My Feet” likely has very little chance of getting out of the early rounds.
This is the sort of thing where Musicologize might employ a Politifct Truth-O-Meter-like graphic that might range from “Way Jacked” for actual infringement to, well, “Pants On Fire” for more of a shot-in-the-dark lottery ticket type of complaint.Īs you might expect, and as is more often than not the case, here I think I’d need the flames. It’s interesting that someone filed the complaint. Because there’s nothing to get into here.Īnd I’m gonna predict that Miley Cyrus, Mike WiLL Made-It and Wiz Khalifa will swat this one aside in short order.
0 kommentar(er)
